Creating Glideways – a volunteer camp.

Conservation, Community and Adventure in Rural NSW

What do Greater Gliders, wombats, international friendships, tree planting, fireside conversations and wildlife surveys have in common?   They were all part of the unforgettable experience of the Creating Glideways camp, held near Taralga, New South Wales in May this year.

Over two weeks, volunteers from various parts of Australia as well as Spain, Russia, Hong Kong and France, came together to learn about conservation, contribute to habitat restoration, and experience life in a rural Australian landscape rich with wildlife and community spirit.

Volunteers were immersed in a unique blend of environmental learning and hands-on action. Guided by ecologists, conservation practitioners and local landholders, participants explored the challenges facing Australia’s native wildlife and discovered how ordinary people can make a difference.

The Greater Glider is under threat due to fragmentation of habitat. They depend on connected forests, high canopy and hollow-bearing trees for survival.

Volunteers received practical training in wildlife monitoring techniques, including camera trapping, Elliot traps, using binoculars, habitat assessments and small mammal surveys. They learned how scientists study biodiversity and how conservation decisions are made on the ground.

Sonia, from Spain, and Ecologist Anne Kerle. Setting Elliot traps. 

The wildlife encounters alone made the experience unforgettable. During the first few days, participants were thrilled to spot kangaroos, wallabies, wombats, colourful birdlife and an echidna. 

A lecture and slide show on Greater Gliders prepared them for the next days of activity.  Night-time spotlighting adventures became a favourite activity, with volunteers wrapping themselves in multiple layers before heading into the forest to search for Greater Gliders. A healthy population of Greater Gliders was discovered in several locations.  Seeing these remarkable nocturnal animals in the canopy was a powerful reminder of why habitat conservation matters.  

Dylan from France setting up a camera trap.

Volunteers planted trees to strengthen future wildlife corridors, assisted with habitat surveys, and worked alongside experts to install specialised nest boxes designed to provide shelter for Greater Gliders and other hollow-dependent species. Cameras were erected on high poles to catch activity at the nest boxes.  Every task contributed to a larger vision of reconnecting habitats across the landscape.

Night time activity. Can you see the long tail? 

Beyond the conservation work, volunteers had opportunities to experience local community life. A visit to the Goulburn Farmers Market introduced participants to local producers and community initiatives, while a tour of the Goulburn Community Solar Farm showcased another inspiring example of grassroots environmental action. A trip to the spectacular Wombeyan Caves provided a well-earned break and the chance to explore one of the region’s natural treasures.

Setting up specially designed nest boxes and cameras in the high canopy.

Perhaps the most rewarding part of the workcamp was the people. Volunteers from different countries and backgrounds lived, cooked, learned and worked together for two weeks. Meals became opportunities to share cultures, stories and ideas. Evenings around the fire sparked conversations about environmental challenges, community action and life around the world.

Participants reflected on how much they valued the environmental knowledge they gained, the friendships they formed and the sense of purpose that came from contributing to a meaningful project.

As one volunteer observed, understanding conservation requires more than reading about it – it comes from spending time in the landscape, learning from experts, and working alongside others who care deeply about protecting it.

The Creating Glideways camp demonstrated the power of bringing together volunteers, scientists, landholders and local communities to address real environmental challenges. It was a chance to develop practical skills, deepen environmental understanding, meet like-minded people and experience Australia in a way that few tourists ever do.

If you’d like to spend time with inspiring people while making a positive difference, an IVP camp could be for you.  Choose from hundreds of camps around the world: https://www.ivp.org.au/project-search/

This report was compiled by Doris Chow from daily reports written by the volunteers.

What a year for International Volunteers for Peace. Some highlights:

🌍 Peace Across the Sea — our first regranting-funded project, training 20 activists across Australia and Indonesia in conflict resolution and project leadership, with impressive grassroots actions from eco-farming camps to zero-waste workshops.

🎪 Workcamps at the Goulburn Show (7th year running!) and our first full Tallong Apple Day Festival camp, welcoming volunteers from Japan, Mexico, Russia and beyond.

🥕 The Goulburn Farmers Market went from strength to strength, with two Makers Markets drawing ~1,000 visitors each and a growing community of stallholders.

🤝 Strengthened ties with the Bhumi Horta Foundation in Indonesia, and representation at the SCI International Committee Meeting in Sofia.

💚 8 new members, a refreshed committee, and steady financial footing to build on in 2026.

Thank you to every volunteer, committee member, and partner who made 2025 possible. Read the full report 2025 Annual Report

#InternationalVolunteersForPeace #IVP #Volunteering #PeaceBuilding #Goulburn

By Professor Helen Ware

Theme “Peace, Resistance Reconciliation”

In Māori “I Te Rongo i Tau, Te Riri i Tau, Te Ringa i Kotuia” there is not a Māori word for reconciliation – this says linking arms together. 

The conference took place in New Plymouth, New Zealand/ Aotearoa.  5th to 8th November.  It was a very friendly conference with a strong emphasis on grass-roots activities and indigenous activism for peace and justice. Professor Kevin Clements’s opening address was a great challenge to his listeners. As he emphasised: “IPRA and its founders were able to develop theories that worked in the past because there was a liberal international rules-based order (albeit a biased order in favour of the West). In this order, it was possible to devise collaborative and rational solutions to the problems of the day. Regional and global institutions were not under attack and vilified as they are today. The United Nations was never able to fulfil its goals because of P5 dominance of the Security Council, but it was respected for its human rights and humanitarian work, and rational evidence -based solutions to wicked problems were encouraged and applied. None of our peace research ancestors could have imagined the chaos generated by the Trump 2.0 presidency……. The world now has 88 democracies compared to 91 autocracies for the first time in over 20 years”.   

The Professor’s analysis of where we are now is powerful and accurate, but, to this researcher, his view of where we are going is as unrealistic as it is attractive. “Peace” he argues “is not something given by the powerful (especially not by the autocrats) – it is something grown, relationally and locally, through trust, truth-telling, personal and social transformation”. For the families of those who died yesterday or who are going to die tomorrow of bombs, bullets or starvation in Gaza, Sudan or Ukraine, peace given by an autocrat would still be a great outcome. Galtung famously distinguished between negative peace when the guns are silent and positive peace when justice and transformation have occurred. This IPRA Conference was largely devoted to positive peace, to the neglect of negative peace and the need to first stop the killing. Clement’s address concluded with an invocation to become “a global tide of compassion, creativity, and courage, flowing from Aotearoa to every fractured corner of the world”. Lovely words, but hardly relevant to the Israeli conscripts, the Russian prisoners released to fight in snow topped trenches or the devils on horseback of Darfur.

 With a constant flow of coffee on tap, at times the conference felt like a workshop on cancer to which no surgeons or cancer specialists but only dieticians and faith healers had been invited. There were some 77 presentations and workshops at the conference (some presenters were not able to come, including one from Bolivia to whom Australia had denied a one-hour transit visa). Since there were four concurrent presentations, at most of the nine sessions it was only possible to attend a quarter of these. At least 14 of the 77 items were clearly signalled as relating to peace education which may be a hopeful sign for the future. However, a presentation on the evaluation of the Latin American online peace education program by Esteban Musiera and Diana Agudelo-Ortez showed that the majority of students did NOT change their views in a more peaceful direction as a result of their studies. 

As a realist (a negative term to most at the conference) I have a general problem with relying on change at the grassroots level, which even when successful, is too slow and too limited in scope to save many lives, for example  in the 35 out of 54 African countries which currently have civil wars (Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law 2025). 

The presentation on the campaign for nuclear disarmament was impressive but warned of future problems. The speakers had brought their actual Nobel Peace Medal with them as a very powerful symbol

 At the practical level, the weather and the physical arrangements were both excellent. [This was the only conference I have ever been to where there was constant coffee on tap and more than enough toilets for females]. 

There were many good points. These included the emphases on the lives and rights of our Māori hosts and other indigenous peoples; the religious diversity (we started with a prayer from a different spiritual tradition each morning). Female and indigenous voices were heard loud and clear throughout. There were representatives from Gaza, South Sudan, and West Papua and a conscientious objector from Israel. The scope of the conference included the performance of a powerful peace ballet composed for the event.

For me the most memorable session was the in-circle talk by the American First Nations Wampanoag elder: Betina Washington about her people’s island which we would know as Martha’s Vinyard. Betina is a non-academic who has spent her life fighting for her people in a pragmatic and principled way. First Nations Americans refer to the USA as “Turtle Island”.  The addresses by the Gazan: Malaka Shwaikh and the West Papuan Rosa Moiwend were both very powerful reflections on their own experiences of genocidal regimes. The Māori closing keynote was a powerful antidote to the stereotype of Māori as being warlike. The conference location in itself was a strong acknowledgement of Parihaka: the Māori peace village founded in the 1870s in non-violent resistance to European settlement on their lands.

IPRA is led by two general secretaries, one male and one female. This year’s new leaders are a female musicologist from Argentina: Maria Elena Lopez Vinader and a male peace educator from Nepal: Rajib Timalsina.  

On the recommendation of a relative who went on international workcamps in their youth, I applied for the Maki village workcamp near Japan’s northern alps and found myself excitedly making my way there at the beginning of June this year. 

Maki village has a fifty year history as an inclusive, organic and self-sufficient community in this relatively isolated part of Japan. It is part of the greater Kyoda Gayusha network of communities, who are especially committed to supporting people with disabilities to live fulfilled lives around others. As volunteers, we were there to help with big seasonal jobs as well as generally gardening and maintenance, which would go towards feeding the community for another year. 

It was clear before we arrived that some elements of the work might challenge us. For instance, the only way to access Maki village was via a two-hour walk with all our gear through hilly forest. Also, our work days were long – starting at 6am and not finishing until about 5pm. Accommodation was simple. We shared rooms in a traditional Japanese Gassho-style (thatched roof) house, where little critters kept us on our toes. 

But we had a really phenomenal time. Waking up to gorgeous views of the Japanese alps over the valley was such a special way to start each day, the weather was consistently summery, and the volunteer group and village residents chatted away as we worked, which meant the days didn’t feel terribly long. There was a good mix of different jobs – planting rice seedlings, stripping trees, working on garden beds, milking the feisty resident goat (mostly unsuccessfully), shelling soy beans, turning honey, and repairing paths. It was strenuous but satisfying to be working solidly each day, and getting work done that directly helped this community’s capacity to sustain itself. 

There was also a fantastic array of cultural and leisure experiences during our stay – cooking over a ground fire, pounding rice to make mochi, folding gyoza, a bonfire night with sparklers, practicing Japanese calligraphy and of course, eating an incredible selection of Japanese dishes including miso soup, fried rice, soy beans, kare, tofu, Japanese plums and traditional herbs fried in tempura. 

By far, the loveliest part of the workcamp was the cultural exchange with both Maki residents and the other volunteers over our thirteen days together. We had a great time stumbling through bits of the Japanese language with our entertaining hosts and marvelling cross-culturally at the wonder of our natural surrounds. I feel very lucky to have had this experience in such a unique and isolated part of Japan, grateful to our generous hosts, and I look forward to more workcamps in future.

Stripping bark from felled trees so that the trunks would dry out insect-less before being used for roof repair on the traditional village houses. 

Our volunteer group harvesting seedlings ready for transplanting into the fields.                     

Rain on our first day planting rice seedlings.          

Afternoon tea break.       

Amazing sunset over the alps; our village house in the foreground. 

The Maki volunteers on our first day, from L-R: Australia, Khue (from Vietnam), Chris (from Germany), Yelena (from Hong Kong) and Rico (from Japan). 

Headshot:

Dear NVDA Members,

On behalf of EC, I’m happy to share NVDA Newsletter Vol. 23 with you. This issue includes updates from our recent activities and stories from our members.

The newsletter is attached. I also would like to thank our members for their support in sending us news & articles for the newsletter, and please feel free to share any updates for the next issue.

NVDA Newsletter Vol.23

Warm regards,
Mia
NVDA Secretariat

Theme “Peace, Resistance Reconciliation”

In Māori “I Te Rongo i Tau, Te Riri i Tau, Te Ringa i Kotuia” there is not a Māori word for reconciliation – this says linking arms together.

This was a very friendly conference with a strong emphasis on grass-roots activities and indigenous activism for peace and justice. Professor Kevin Clements’s opening address (attached) was a great challenge to his listeners. As he emphasised: “IPRA and its founders were able to develop theories that worked in the past because there was a liberal international rules-based order (albeit a biased order in favour of the West). In this order, it was possible to devise collaborative and rational solutions to the problems of the day. Regional and global institutions were not under attack and vilified as they are today. The United Nations was never able to fulfil its goals because of P5 dominance of the Security Council. But it was respected for its human rights and humanitarian work, and rational evidence -based solutions to wicked problems were encouraged and applied. None of our peace research ancestors could have imagined the chaos generated by the Trump 2.0 presidency……. The world now has 88 democracies compared to 91 autocracies for the first time in over 20 years”.   The Professor’s analysis of where we are now is powerful and accurate, but, to this researcher, his view of where we are going is as unrealistic as it is attractive. “Peace” he argues “is not something given by the powerful (especially not by the autocrats) – it is something grown, relationally and locally, through trust, truth-telling, personal and social transformation”. For the families of those who died yesterday or who are going to die tomorrow of bombs, bullets or starvation in Gaza, Sudan or Ukraine, peace given by an autocrat would still be a great outcome. Galtung famously distinguished between negative peace when the guns are silent and positive peace when justice and transformation has occurred. This IPRA Conference was largely devoted to positive peace, to the neglect of negative peace and the need to first stop the killing. Clement’s address concluded with an invocation to become “a global tide of compassion, creativity, and courage, flowing from Aotearoa to every fractured corner of the world”. Lovely words, but hardly relevant to the Israeli conscripts, the Russian prisoners released to fight in snow topped trenches or the devils on horseback of Darfur.

With a constant flow of coffee on tap, at times the conference felt like a workshop on cancer to which no surgeons or cancer specialists but only dieticians and faith healers had been invited. There were some 77 presentations and workshops at the conference (some presenters were not able to come, including one from Bolivia to whom Australia had denied a one-hour transit visa). Since there were four concurrent presentations, at most of the nine sessions it was only possible to attend a quarter of these. This was especially frustrating since titles did not always clearly indicate their topics or even which country they were referring to. At least 14 of the 77 items were clearly signalled as relating to peace education which may be a hopeful sign for the future. However, a presentation on the evaluation of the Latin American online peace education program by Esteban Musiera and Diana Agudelo-Ortez showed that the majority of students did NOT change their views in a more peaceful direction as a result of their studies.

As a realist (a negative term to most at the conference) I have a general problem with relying on change at the grassroots level, which even when successful, is too slow and too limited in scope to save many lives, for example  in the 35 out of 54 African countries which currently have civil wars (Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law 2025).

The presentation on the campaign for nuclear disarmament was impressive but warned of future problems. The speakers had brought their actual Nobel Peace Medal with them as a very powerful symbol

At the practical level, the weather and the physical arrangements were both excellent. [This was the only conference I have ever been to where there was constant coffee on tap and more than enough toilets for females].

There were many good points. These included the emphases on the lives and rights of our Māori hosts and other indigenous peoples; the religious diversity (we started with a prayer from a different spiritual tradition each morning). Female and indigenous voices were heard loud and clear throughout. There were representatives from Gaza, South Sudan, West Papua and South Sudan and a conscientious objector from Israel. The scope of the conference included the performance of a powerful peace ballet composed for the event.

It seems ungrateful to mention some negative features, but it could be useful to point out some possibilities for improvements for next time.

One major issue was that the choice of presentations to go in each session often appeared totally random with almost no opportunity for discussions of topics spanning more than one paper at a time. Next year would it be a good idea to have some sessions with geographic themes as well as workshops on particular topics?  There had been a deliberate decision not to have session chairs and to leave the 3 or 4 presenters to self-manage. Sometimes this worked, sometimes it did not, though in general it was accepted that good time keeping represents the fairest sharing of a scarce resource. However, it was almost impossible to politely change between sessions to be able to listen to two presentations of significant importance to individual researchers.

Some of the presenters were students who were at various stages of their research. There was a need to clearly tell students and early career researchers that what the listeners wanted to hear was about the specifics of their country, their group and their topic not a standard repetition of the theories Lederach or other leaders. It was tragic to hear an African who had travelled with difficulty across the world give an undergraduate theory lecture when they could have been sharing their personal experiences and understanding of being amid an ongoing civil war.

This IPRA conference had a very strong focus on the grass roots but remarkably little on global events. Whilst it may be wonderful to uplift 20 people as one speaker described, this is not going to save many lives.

For me the most memorable session was the in-circle talk by the American First Nations Wampanoag elder: Betina Washington about her people’s island which we would know as Martha’s Vinyard. Betina is a non-academic who has spent her life fighting for her people in a pragmatic and principled way. First Nations Americans refer to the USA as “Turtle Island”.  The addresses by the Gazan: Malaka Shwaikh and the West Papuan Rosa Moiwend were both very powerful reflections on their own experiences of genocidal regimes. The Māori closing keynote was a powerful antidote to the stereotype of Māori as being warlike. The conference location in itself was a strong acknowledgement of Parihaka: the Māori peace village founded in the 1870s in non-violent resistance to European settlement on their lands.

IPRA is led by two general secretaries, one male and one female. This year’s new leaders are a female musicologist from Argentina: Maria Elena Lopez Vinader and a male peace educator from Nepal: Rajib Timalsina.